‘No Agreement’
On Swedish N-Plant Closure As Poll Shows High Nuclear Support
The negotiator appointed by Sweden’s government
to discuss the details and timetable for the eventual closure
of the country’s nuclear facilities says he has failed to reach
an agreement with utilities over the proposed shut-down of the
Barseback-2 nuclear plant.
Negotiator Bo Bylund, who has the task of trying
to persuade Swedish utilities to voluntarily close Sweden’s nuclear
power plants, was originally expected to present his report by
1st May.
In a letter sent to Sweden’s department of industry
this week he said that, despite taking extra time to try to resolve
the issue, agreement could not be reached concerning Barseback-2
– although talks about the fate of the country’s 10 other operational
units were still continuing.
Following the closure of Barseback-1 in 1999
under a politically-inspired agreement, the government wanted
to move ahead with the closure of Barseback-2. However, the second
unit cannot be closed unless the government shows that the lost
electricity production can be compensated for.
Separately, a new opinion poll shows that even
while the Swedish government continues to contemplate future energy
policy, public support for the ongoing use of nuclear power in
the country remains strong.
The poll, commissioned by the country’s Nuclear
Safety and Training Centre (KSU) and conducted by the Swedish
research company TEMO, asked a representative sample of more than
1000 Swedes a series of questions regarding the use of nuclear
energy.
Of the total respondents, 27% said they supported
the continued use of nuclear energy in Sweden until the 11 units
currently in operation reach the end of their operational lives;
32% supported the continued use of nuclear energy together with
the development of new nuclear capacity as and when needed; and
21% supported the development and expansion of nuclear capacity
in Sweden. Only 17% of respondents supported ending the use of
nuclear generation in the country as soon as possible, while 3%
were undecided.
Source: Hans Ehdwall, KSU
Full reports: NucNet News No. 110 & 111, 11th May & 12th
May |