 |
WE SACRIFICE ˛˛˛ REACTOR OF NPP, BUT SAVE ˛V
In this way we will avoid a sudden increase in the price of electricity
By Iordan Iordanov
More of the Bulgarian state institutions do not pay
enough attention the opinion of nuclear experts during the process of
negotiations of Bulgaria on the Chapter Power Industry.
I express my opinion in the very beginning that although half of my
life has passed on the territory of Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) “Kozloduy”,
I support strongly Bulgaria’s accession in the EU in 2007 even if the
only price for that is to close down all small reactors.
However, there are some discrepancies in the process of negotiations,
which impress us unfavorably. One of them is the discrepancy of the
standpoints and opinions of the official politicians in Europe and the
specialists that has made the partnership inspection.
The opinion stated by the latter that reactors ˛˛˛ and ˛V are safe,
does not correspond with the standpoint of politicians and leads to
logical doubts in the activities of the latter, particularly the recently
expressed stand that it is not Europe, but us, who want to close down
both reactors.
The possible way out of this situation is as follows: to discuss a variant
for closing down reactor ˛˛˛ upon the accession of Bulgaria in the EU,
and reactor ˛V will continue its operation until 2011.
There are a lot of arguments supporting this stand. The safety of the
closed down reactors is as important as the safety of workers. They
contain worked-off nuclear fuel for a term of at least 5-6 years following
their closing down. They are real nuclear equipment, which may be dangerous,
and they require the same means, staff and costs, as well as those reactors
in operation. If reactor ˛V continues to operate until 2011, it will
incinerate completely the fuel of the remaining ones, with which safety
will increase. Only in this way maximum depth of incineration of the
remaining nuclear fuel will be achieved. By burning uranium 5 in the
worked off nuclear fuel, which remains on the territory of Bulgaria,
the said fuel will be a lot safer.
While being in operation, reactor ˛V will generate the necessary incomes
for the current servicing of the closed down first, second and third
reactors.
At the moment about BGN 550 million have been raised for the safe closing
down of the reactors. This sum is extremely insufficient and the right
thing is Bulgaria as a future member of the EU not to burden the European
taxpayer with costs for closing down two additional reactors. If we
close flexibly first reactor ˛˛˛, and then reactor ˛V, we will be proud
to say that we alone have provided the funds for closing down the reactors,
as well as for the construction of a new NPP.
The economic effect will have one more dimension – the import of fuel
will be reduced, since we have paid for such fuel in advance.
Another related to nuclear safety serious issue, which is not paid the
sufficient attention, is what to do with the worked off nuclear fuel,
whether it has to be stored in the country or abroad.
At the moment “the wet depot” on the territory of NPP “Kozloduy” is
completely full with 5 000 cassettes of worked off nuclear fuel.
We want to build a new “dry depot” as well with capacity of 5 000 cassettes
of all the closed down reactors, for which we will have to pay $US 90
million. In order to transport the worked off nuclear fuel in Russia,
we will need about $US 250-300 million.
From the point of view of safety transporting the fuel in Russia is
the better decision. And with the help of the resources of the funds
earned by the last operating small reactor, the whole worked off fuel
has to be transported in Russia.
The proposal for prolonging the period of service of reactor ˛V until
2011 will have a social effect as well. If the incomes for its operation
are used only for the safe closing down of reactors ˛, ˛˛ and ˛˛˛ and
the transportation of the worked off nuclear fuel in Russia, no increase
in the price of electricity will be imperative in the near future, since
otherwise these costs will be estimated in the price of electricity
produced by reactors V and V˛.
The author was the former head of NPP “Kozloduy”, and
presently is the mayor of Vitosha municipality.

|
 |